Advanced Project Management LT13 and Reduce its Energy Consumption

Question: Discuss about the Advanced Project Management LT13. Answer: Introduction The project task is to renovate the building of an educational institute and also to reduce its energy consumption. The project is also concerned with safeguarding the health condition, education and learning, provide vocational and general educational school. The projects have also provided work for many unemployed workers and also technicians required for various technical aspects of the buildings. In order to make sure that energy is saved, initiatives has been taken by replacement of exterior door and windows, renovation of boiler-house and heating units, the method of upgrading of supply of hot water and heating systems, providing thermal insulation of walls and buildings roofs and the security system of the projects. All these were included in the LT 13 project of Burwood. Challenges of LT13 project The first part of the management LT13 project deals with the problem of the quality of the area. Through the following study the project manager would be able to analyze about the quality of the area being worked upon, the project manager representatives tend to expand the plan given upon them by the supervisors. This states that the councils are not focusing on short term quality but they are want to make sure that the project maintains the same quality in the long run (Programme for the upgrading of educational institutions, 2016). In the Burwood project of construction of LT13 it can be identified that the assurance quality and control quality must operate or manage not by the contractor or any other third party but it should be managed by the particular company project manager. The project manager needs to be strong-minded that the particular company must analysis and support job detailed construction to the supplier inferiority plans which the work has been started earlier. If t he engineer does not complete the allocated construction than it needs to be the reworked again or for any other issue which has been strongly recommended, once creation is underway, contractors must make sure that the ground engineers need to communicate with the development engineers past to any engineering alterations will be made. It develops what has actually taken place or what the management of the construction has planned (Joseph et al. 2007). It is vital to take down when the project is ongoing. All field engineers and project engineers should be well qualified by professionally and aware with confined codes and standards. Some of the time due to nation change province change to others and other change of standard depends on county or municipality. To start the project the engineer should be correct at the starting. The local codes of familiarity and professional qualification and standard should need to be essential. If the LT13 project company expects the outsource engine er of different project location small education sessions or formal training is necessary to confirm that the codes, project procedure, and standards are familiar to the contractor. The second part is that part where the project managers are tested i.e. to have a plan of cost. In some circumstances the project is on the way with misinformation as the project of LT13 is appraisal is complete to be seen poorer that it would be seen it, in reality, to get project approval in final. To maintain the cost of the LT13 project the accounting of the project must need to start from the beginning. There also have a requirement to the project process in tracking in place of any scope of changing and projecting any further cost that may get up due to changing of scope. So, these are all the business challenges that have been managed and looked upon while doing this LT13 project. Organizational structure of managing In this construction, the project manager has high-level permission to control or to manage the project resources. The project manager has full permission on this project structure that can obtain the needed resources to accomplish the objectives of the project through outside or inside of the organization that has the only the subject of quality and constraints budget that can identify the project. Project manager assigned the report and project directly of the project structure (Rangelova 2015). The manager of the project is liable for the appraisal performance and progression career of all team member LT13 project which leads to increase the loyalty in the work. Comprehensive expert of a line over the LT13 project the labors gives the project manager centralized lines and tough project control which makes rapid improved response and time of reaction. Moreover, project workers are engaged on a long term basis rather than part-time or common basis. The strong identification project sense and ownership are developed by the teams of the project in efforts of deep loyalty to the LT13 project and better understand the activities nature of project, goals or mission. In the project of LT13 limited opportunities exists and sharing of knowledge about the project which is a common factor between team participants concerning the deficiency of occupation continuity and chances for specialized development. A variation of this wholesome project method is provisionally project-based administrations. The LT13 project organization contains a planning team that dragged together provisionally from their database component and controlled by a manager of a project which is not reported to a unit of the program. The project manager has the full authority and supervision of the project team to make the big project of LT13 (Rangelova 2015). Construction Method The Executive officer of LT13 project Burwood has undertaken the construction method to the modification phase. To ensure the construction method the key principle of incorporates adequately process is required to study the method of construction. The method of construction is used in the project of LT13 which are (1) dependable with the principle criteria of design that has been described in the project. (2) Consider chances for modification of the scheme footmark within the safety corridor of the road in functional and engineering cause (Detailed design and construction of the proposed upgrade, 2017). (3) Report any uncertain matters connected with the improvement of the conception design as labeled in this ecological assessment and any following proposals report. (4) meet any circumstances of support rising from the ecological calculation endorsement process unless variations to the situations of support are approved subsequently. (5) The innovation of incorporate opportunities. ( 6) Escape from sensitive identical environment areas and species which is significant. (7) Impact measure of management has the need to be refined and developed. (8) Properly mature and integrate the design of urban strategy and land has perception development in the ecological valuation. (9) Be steady with ecological principle and sustainable development. These all the types of construction method that are used by the LT13 project to make a sustainable complex which is environment-friendly. Planning Through the results of analyses done the decision has become recommended or apparent subject of the action which can be supported by analyzing completely. SFP will become the essence of this recommendations. By the process to authorize organizationally most managers of the faculty will give the senior management about the recommendations that have few adjustment and negotiation plan and to get funding and final approval plan for which the plan has been proposed. In the organization objectives, the integrating planning to balanced methodology scoreboard is recommended by IFMA. The IFMA recognizes that there are many selected methods by the organization for facility management and business process that conforms to bring up with the line of the methodologies of the organization. There are some of the planning that is in the construction of LT13 in Burwood which are (1) addressed of the primary objective should be documented in SFP, (2) Evaluate costs, sites, zoning, competition, labor a nd all other critical factors that lead to success. (3) Conduct risk and economic analysis to look for getting the high value. (4) Alternatives develop with priorities and recommendations. (5) Develop of marketing recommended process to gain approval of the management. (6) To launch the phase of action other approvals is needed to obtain financial benefits (Roper, 2009). It is also essential to note down that if once it is approved it will evolve to continue by SFP and to get a condition of changing inside and outside of the organization. It will give a minor adjustment if the SFP have good flexibility to accommodate. Project Cost Summary Job name: 2275-DDR0 Job Description Client Name: Deakin University Building HC Lecture Theatre LT13 Stage 1 Maintenance Upgrade Works Design Development Cost Plan Rev.0 Trade No Trade description Trade % Cost/m2 Sub Total Mark Up % Trade Total 1 Area 2 Demolition Alterations 3.26 16.30 15000 15000 3 Floor Preparation 2.17 10.87 10000 10000 4 Metal Work 2.39 11.96 11000 11000 5 Carpentry 0.87 4.35 4000 4000 6 Doors, Frames hardware 1.96 9.78 9000 9000 7 Aluminum Screens and Hardware 0.22 1.09 1000 1000 8 Floor Finishing 10.87 54.35 50000 50000 9 Plasterboard 2.61 13.04 12000 12000 10 ceiling 1.30 6.52 6000 6000 11 Acoustic Treatment 2.17 10.87 10000 10000 12 Painting 5.65 28.26 26000 26000 13 Build in fitness 14 Blind graphics 0.27 1.36 1250 1250 15 Electrical servics 8.70 43.48 40000 40000 16 Mechanical services 17 seating 24.14 120.68 11125 11125 18 Scaffold 3.26 16.30 15000 15000 19 Pc sums 0.54 2.72 2500 2500 20 Preliminaries and margin 11.14 55.68 51225 51225 21 Design contingency sum 2.17 10.87 10000 10000 22 Total tender sum 385000 23 Construction contingency sum 5.0% 4.35 21.74 20000 20000 24 Total anticipated construction cost 405000 25 Consultant fees 7.16 38.04 35000 35000 26 Deakin: - minor builder works 1.09 5.43 5000 5000 27 Deakin: - infrastructure ITS 28 Deakin: - security 0.54 2.72 2500 2500 29 other 0.54 2.72 2500 2500 30 Project contingency sum 2.17 10.87 10000 10000 31 Total project sum 460000 32 exclusion GFA:920m2 100.00 500.00 460000 460000 Final Total: $ 460000 Conclusion Through this study, it has been briefly understood that the construction project of LT13 in Burwood had helped the locality people in their livelihood. The main theme of the project is to make a better welfare for the people of Burwood. The project includes the educational facility, new method of study, a safeguard of health and household activities using benefits. The operational manager of LT13 project and its team had done a great job through the safe authority of the government that the people of Burwood are living a comfortable life. Through the constructing method planning and after the construction it has clear that the project like LT13 had given a good and better opportunities life to the Burwood people and to their future. References Amalraj, J., Hernani, C., Ladouceur, K., Verma, A. (2007). Challenges Lessons Learned.Project Management:. n.d.Retrieved from https://www.beg.utexas.edu/energyecon/ua_2007/AB_Project_Mgt_challenges.pdf Detailed design and construction of the proposed upgrade (2017).Tintenbar to Ewingsdale Upgrade. n.d.Retrieved from https://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/documents/projects/northern-nsw/tintenbar-to-ewingsdale/tintenbar-6-detailed-design-and-construction.pdf Programme for the upgrading of educational institutions (2016).Measures-odyssee-mure. Retrieved from https://www.measures-odyssee-mure.eu/public/mure_pdf/tertiary/LT13.PDF Rangelova, F. (2015). BASIC ASPECTS OF ADVANCED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT.BULTEST STANDARD LTD. n.d.Retrieved from https://uacg.bg/filebank/att_8857.pdf Roper, K. (2009). Strategic Facility Planning.International Facility Management Association. Retrieved from https://www.ifma.org/docs/default-source/knowledge-base/sfp_whitepaper.pdf